Communal Tensions Fester Due To Inaction
October 23rd, 2008 by admin | Comments Off | Filed in CarsCommunal tensions fester due to inaction
bY Nitish Sengupta
Whether it is Kandhamal in Orissa or Mangalore in Karnataka or parts of Kerala, the story is the same. There is provocative action by a few Christians, and in reprisal, mobs of Hindu fanatics start killing Christians and desecrating churches, forcing innocent Christians to flee for succour.
The Hindu mobs belong to the extremist fringes of the Sangh Parivar viz. the Vishwa Hindu Parishad and Bajrang Dal. The police remain inactive at the start, only to swing into action when it is too late. The entirety of this reminds me of a wise observation in the Oxford History of India, which remains valid even after seven or eight decades: “The incident deserves notice because it is a good illustration of the way in which the unexpected happens in India and the facility with which an ordinary complaint against the administration can be used to excite a fanatical outburst of religious enthusiasm”.
In Kandhamal, which apparently has a history of such troubles, the VHP leader and Hindu monk Swami Laxmananda Saraswati is murdered by unknown miscreants. Normally, one would have expected the police to immediately take charge of the situation, register an FIR, interrogate witnesses and others who had known the victim and arrest a large number of people including the suspects, and basically, in general, make a decisive show of force. The local leaders of Bajrang Dal could have been cautioned or even taken in custody for interrogation. The magistrate could have clamped Section 144 in the area, making it impossible for a mob to gather. Obviously, no such action was taken by the authorities, thereby allowing tension to express itself. There was no trace of visible police action in the initial stages. The mobs could gather with impunity and proceed on their marauding action. The administration became active only after the proverbial horse had bolted. Strangely, there’s been no evidence of the intelligence branch being active in a district like Kandhamal, considering its past history.
In Mangalore, it was reported that a new convert into Christianity, with the proverbial zeal of a convert, had written against the Hindu religion in abusive language, decrying its Gods and criticising some of its practices. Now this could not have happened in a day or two. The administration should have been alert about this and should have taken timely penal action against him. This would have driven the message to the local Hindu community and their leaders that the authorities were taking deterrent action. Also, leaders of the local Christian community should have restrained the errant co-religionists. A visible show of action on from the authorities could have avoided much of what happened subsequently. In Kerala also, by and large, the same pattern was repeated.
In all these cases, the essential point to emphasise is that there has been a lack of decisive show of force and intention from the administration. Deterrent force, at initial stages, along with other remedial measures, can prevent a lot of unpleasant aforementioned events.
It should be remembered that Christianity is not an import by European colonial rulers. It reached the shores of India in the 1st century after Christ and has existed ever since with a general record of harmony. Christians comprise only two per cent of India’s total population, but are the overwhelming majority in three northeastern states - Nagaland, Mizoram and Meghalaya. They are also a strong force in Kerala and Karnataka.
It is only in recent times that one section in Christianity has garnered notoriety and annoyance with a section of the extremist fringes in the Sangh Parivar, namely, the Catholic Church, for carrying on conversions. Both sides must face reason.
The Hindus should remember that the Upanishads and the Gita, which hold the real essence of true Hinduism, prescribe tolerance of other faiths. They should recall the following dictum of Lord Krishna in the Gita: “Whoever worships me in whichever form, I accept that worship. Men, following different paths, arrive at the same destination”.
Also, on this line, is a famous statement of Swami Vivekananda: “Those who are born Christians, should become good Christians. Those who are born Muslims, should become good Muslims and those born Hindus, should become good Hindus and there is no need for any conversion as such.”
If the VHP, Bajrang Dal and the proselytising Catholics would bear these principles in mind, there will be no need for any conflict. We should never forget India’s long tradition of secularism and religious tolerance and if we all respect each other’s religious beliefs, there will be no occasion for conflict.
Everyone has the right under our Constitution to practise and profess his/her religious beliefs and all must show corresponding tolerance towards other faiths. This should bring about peace and remove discords. It is the duty of the administration to foster this spirit and take deterrent action whenever there is any departure from this.
Dr Nitish Sengupta, an academic and an author, is a former Member of Parliament and a former secretary to the Government of India
Above all, US needs a gallon-savvy President
By Thomas L. Friedman
The 2 is back. Last week, US retail gasoline prices fell below $3 a gallon - to an average of $2.91 - the lowest level in almost a year. Why does this news leave me with mixed feelings?
Because in the middle of this wrenching economic crisis, with unemployment rising and 401(k)’s shrinking, it would be a real source of relief for many Americans to get a break at the pump. Today’s declining gasoline prices act like a tax cut for consumers and can save $15 to $20 a tank-full for an SUV-driving family, compared with when gasoline was $4.11 a gallon in July.
Yet, it is impossible for me to ignore the fact that when gasoline hit $4.11 a gallon we changed - a lot. Americans drove less, polluted less, exercised more, rode more public transportation and, most importantly, overwhelmed Detroit with demands for smaller, more fuel-efficient, hybrid and electric cars. The clean energy and efficiency industries saw record growth - one of our few remaining engines of real quality job creation.
But with little credit available today for new energy start-ups, and lower oil prices making it harder for existing renewables like wind and solar to scale, and a weak economy making it nearly impossible for Congress to pass a carbon tax or gasoline tax that would make clean energy more competitive, what will become of our budding clean-tech revolution?
This moment feels to me like a bad B-movie rerun of the 1980s. And I know how this movie ends - with our re-addiction to oil and Opec, as well as corrosive uncertainty for our economy, trade balance, security and environment.
“Is the economic crisis going to be the end of green?” asks David Rothkopf, energy consultant and author of Superclass. “Or, could green be the way to end the economic crisis?”
It has to be the latter. We can’t afford a financial bailout that also isn’t a green build-up - a build-up of a new clean energy industry that strengthens America and helps the planet.
But how do we do that without any policy to affect the price signal for gasoline and carbon?
Here are some ideas: First, Washington could impose a national renewable energy standard that would require every utility in the country to produce 20 per cent of its power from clean, non-CO2-emitting, energy sources - wind, solar, hydro, nuclear, biomass - by 2025. About half the states already have these in place, but they are all different.
It would create a huge domestic pull for renewable energy if we had a uniform national mandate.
Second, Washington could impose a national requirement that every state move its utilities to a system of “decoupling-plus”.
This is the technical term for changing the way utilities make money - shifting them from getting paid for how much electricity or gas they get you to consume to getting paid for how much electricity or gas they get you to save. Several states have already moved down this path.
Third, an idea offered by Andy Karsner, former assistant secretary of energy, would be to modify the tax code so that any company that invests in new domestic manufacturing capacity for clean energy technology - or procures any clean energy system or energy savings device that is made by an American manufacturer - can write down the entire cost of the investment via a tax credit and/or accelerated depreciation in the first year.
“I’m talking about anything from energy efficient windows to water heaters to industrial boilers to solar panels, and the job creating, manufacturing facilities that produce them - anything that makes us more efficient, lean and economically competitive and comes from a domestic, American source,” said Karsner.
He also suggests using some of the money from any stimulus package to directly incentivise and support states’ efforts to implement and intelligently modernise their building codes to get already well-established national “best practices” quickly into their marketplaces.
Lastly, we need the next President to be an energy efficiency trendsetter, starting by reinventing the inaugural parade. Get rid of the black stretch limos and double-plated armoured Chevy Tahoes inching down Pennsylvania Avenue. Instead, let the next President announce that he will use no vehicles on inauguration day that get less than 30 miles per gallon. He could invite all car companies to participate in the historic drive with their best available American-made, fuel-efficient, innovative vehicle.
Finally, if Congress passes another stimulus package, it can’t just be another round of $600 cheques to go buy flat-screen TVs made in China. It has to also include bridges to somewhere - targeted investments in scientific research, mass transit, domestic clean-tech manufacturing and energy efficiency that will make us a more productive and innovative society, one with more skills, more competitiveness, more productivity and better infrastructure to lead the next great industrial revolution: ET - energy technology.
Sarkozy, a catalyst for a new economic order
By S. Nihal Singh
As the world lurches from one crisis to another in the hope of stemming the flood of economic woes, France’s President Nicolas Sarkozy has emerged as the key to a more predictable future.
The hyperactive politician that he is, he happens to occupy the rotating presidency of the European Union, a position he has used to win support from the grouping and to chivvy US President George W. Bush to look beyond his nose.
Even as President Sarkozy has won his US counterpart’s agreement to holding an economic summit of the developed and major developing countries, some time after the US presidential election in early November, there are important philosophical and ideological differences between the two sides. The American preference seems to be to tinker with the present system to guard against the kind of abuses that have taken place, while the French-led European view is to overhaul the post-World War II Bretton Woods institutions to bring them in tune with the 21st century.
As a recent swing through Europe I undertook revealed, Europeans, who had by and large resigned themselves to the inevitability of adopting American methods of capitalism and diluted their social welfare systems to meet competition, have now woken up to the merits of their mixed economies. Although social welfare schemes have been cut in many European countries, there is renewed recognition that a kinder capitalism benefits their people by preserving social peace and harmony.
Europeans are still recovering from the shock of the gross abuses indulged in by American chief executives and a system that permitted a few to feather their own nests at the cost of their shareholders and the public. Even more mortifying for Europeans is the stark fact that their renowned banking and other institutions were so tempted by easy money to be made that they skirted ingrained principles of prudence to expose their venerable institutions to economic ruin. Who could have imagined the supposedly rock solid Swiss banking institutions have had to be rescued by their government?
Partly, of course, the scale of banking losses across the European continent and in Britain is the flip side of globalisation and the chain effects the American sub-prime crisis has had on institutions across the world. It shows how important American economy remains in influencing the world. But President Bush has been swearing his commitment to “democratic capitalism” and unfettered free markets, despite the disaster the unrestrained conduct of its hoary banking institutions and their chief executives has brought on his country and the world.
President Bush must cope with the immediate problems of his own and the world’s economy in the sunset days of his presidency.
The longer term consequences of the economic meltdown will fall into the lap of his successor, but the world’s economic health is simply too important to tailor it to the presidential changeover. The coming weeks will show how much of a prisoner President Bush and his advisers are to their neoconservative ideology. There is first the domestic problem of devising foolproof regulatory systems to ensure that chief executives do not walk away with millions in golden handshakes leaving their shareholders and country in the lurch. But the more important question is the restructuring of the world’s financial institutions to cope with present and future demands.
To an extent, the Group of Eight industrialised countries have been making largely symbolic gestures to the emerging countries to involve them in the consultation process.
But Europeans, led by President Sarkozy, are more attuned to the need of making major emerging economies - the countries most commonly mentioned are China, India and Brazil - part of the new system of global economic management than mere adjuncts to them.
American reluctance radically to alter the Bretton Woods institutions and the basis on which they work is understandable.
The United States enjoys immense clout in the functioning of these institutions and often uses them as levers to pursue its foreign policy objectives. At the same time, Washington recognises that with the emergence of BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) and the vast transfer of resources in the oil and gas-producing countries of West Asia, new actors will have to be brought into the system.
The argument taking place in many world capitals is the extent and manner in which new nations are brought in. In other words, how radically should Bretton Woods institutions be restructured? President Sarkozy is seeking to maintain the momentum gained by British Prime Minister Gordon Brown showing the way in nationalising key faltering British banks.
This remedy has been followed across Europe and, more reluctantly, by President Bush.
President Sarkozy has crossed the first hurdle by persuading President Bush to convene a conference of many economies of the developed and developing world.
But Washington is resisting the European view that there must be limits to unfettered trade and economic interactions and a strict regimen of regulations is required to curb the greed of those who seek to make money at the expense of the people and the State.
All that the envisaged summit, expected before the end of December, can achieve is to be a curtain raiser for the hard decisions that must be taken by the next US President. The reform of institutions always lags behind changing reality, but the scale of the world economic crisis drawing parallels with the Great Depression of the 1930s has made the urgency of changing the way present institutions work self-evident.
President Sarkozy’s term as the European Union president ends in December, but he, together with Germany, is expected to remain a key player in promoting a more rational world economic order. There are, of course, divisions in European ranks, revealed recently by the rebellion of some to meeting the ambitious global warming targets set by the EU. Even more importantly, the former Communist States look towards Washington for guidance while enjoying the economic benefits of belonging to the EU.
Look what He has done… made my life so beautiful
By Aruna Irani
Whatever I have seen in life has been because of God. I always ask Him for strength. I devote some time for prayer each morning. It is in those minutes of solitude that my inner self awakens. Whatever I do in life, whatever I create, stems from these precious moments.
God cannot fulfil all your desires. But that is not the purpose of prayer.
When one wants to achieve something in life, it is very easy to go wrong and get depressed if your wishes are not fulfilled.
Destiny cannot be changed. I simply pray to keep myself on the right path. The older you grow, the less you want to hurt others, and the more you want to grow closer to God.
I have had a strong faith in God since I was a child. Usually one learns this from one’s parents. But for me it was the other way round. My parents were not religious. I taught them to pray. I am not educated; I knew that I won’t be able to come up in life. But look what He has done for me. He made my life beautiful.
He is always with me, behind me, wrong or right. If I unintentionally do something wrong, I ask forgiveness for hurting others. Whether it happened because of me or it was His intention, I always ask Him to set things right and He always does that.
- Aruna Irani is a well-known actor
Powell speaks for Muslims, Obama
By Maureen Dowd
Colin Powell had been bugged by many things in his party’s campaign this fall: The insidious merging of rumours that Barack Obama was Muslim with intimations that he was a terrorist sympathiser; the assertion that Sarah Palin was ready to be President; the uniformed sheriff who introduced governor Palin by sneering about Barack Hussein Obama; the scorn with which Republicans spit out the words “community organiser”; the Republicans’ argument that using taxes to “spread the wealth” was socialist when the purpose of taxes is to spread the wealth; Palin’s insidious notion that small towns in states that went for W. were “the real America”.
But what sent him over the edge and made him realise he had to speak out was when he opened his New Yorker three weeks ago and saw a picture of a mother pressing her head against the gravestone of her son, a 20-year-old soldier who had been killed in Iraq. On the headstone were engraved his name, Kareem Rashad Sultan Khan, his awards - the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star - and a crescent and a star to denote his Islamic faith.
Khan was an all-American kid. A 2005 graduate of Southern Regional High School in Manahawkin, New Jersey, he loved the Dallas Cowboys and playing video games with his 12-year-old stepsister, Aliya. His obituary in the Star-Ledger of Newark said that he had sent his family back pictures of himself playing soccer with Iraqi children. His father said Kareem had been eager to enlist since he was 14 and was outraged by the 9/11 attacks. “His Muslim faith did not make him not want to go,” Feroze Khan, told the Gannett News Service after his son died. “He looked at it that he’s American and he has a job to do”. In a gratifying “have you no sense of decency, Sir and Madam?” moment, Colin Powell on Sunday talked about Khan, and the unseemly ways John McCain and Palin have been polarising the country. Even the Obama campaign has shied away from Muslims. The candidate has gone to synagogues but no mosques, and the campaign was embarrassed when it turned out that two young women in headscarves had not been allowed to stand behind Obama during a speech in Detroit because aides did not want them in the TV shot. The former secretary of state has dealt with prejudice in his life, in and out of the Army, and he is keenly aware of how many millions of Muslims around the world are being offended by the slimy tenor of the race against Obama.
He told Tom Brokaw that he was troubled by what other Republicans, not McCain, had said: ” ‘Well, you know that Mr Obama is a Muslim’. Well, the correct answer is, he is not a Muslim. He’s a Christian. He’s always been a Christian. But the really right answer is, what if he is? Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country? The answer’s no. That’s not America. Is something wrong with some seven-year-old Muslim-American kid believing that he or she could be President?”
Powell got a note from Feroze Khan this week thanking him.
Deccan Chronicle